2

Sounds made using the glottalic egressive airstream mechanism (one of the six main airstream mechanisms, and also of the four that are actually phonemic in natural human languages) are known as ejectives; these are produced by pushing air upwards and outwards with the glottis. One frequently hears that ejectives can only ever be voiceless, as voicing an ejective would require opening the glottis, allowing the air above to escape through the glottis and preventing it from inducing the necessary airflow movement.

This argument would, intuitively, seem to apply to all glottalic sounds (both egressive and ingressive), not just ejectives; after all, if air can escape downwards through an upwards-moving glottis, it should also be able to escape upwards through a downwards-moving glottis.1 However, glottalic ingressives (known as implosives), far from obligatory voicelessness, are almost universally voiced, with the descending glottis being left slightly open so that a thin stream of air can pass upwards through it (often assisted by some degree of pulmonic egressive airflow coming up from the lungs) and vibrate the vocal cords.2 There seems to be no obvious reason one couldn't do that with an ejective (which is, after all, an implosive in reverse), with an almost-closed-but-slightly-open glottis moving upwards against the air column and some of the pressure above the glottis passing downwards through it to vibrate the vocal cords and voice the ejective (possibly assisted by a bit of pulmonic ingressive airflow helping to pull air down through the glottis).

Why is it that, apparently, the glottis can be slightly open for voicing and still produce sound when it's moving down, but has to be tightly closed in order to produce sound when it's moving up?


1: Several parts of the human body do have check valves that mean fluids can go one way through but not the other way; however, the respiratory system is check-valve-free.

2: In fact, with voiced implosives, most of the air movement is actually air moving upwards3 through the glottis, with only a small contribution from air being dragged downwards behind the glottis.

3: Upwards relative to the descending glottis, that is; in actuality, what happens is mostly the glottis moving downwards over a near-motionless air column.

1 Answer 1

2

Voicing requires higher subglottal pressure than supraglottal pressure. When the larynx lowers, the supraglottal cavity increases in size and the subglottal cavity decreases, which means that supraglottal pressure decreases and subglottal pressure increases. Therefore voicing is highly likely when the larynx lowers. The opposite holds when the larynx raises, as in the case of an ejective.

The glottis has weak check-valve properties, in that when touching, the folds can be more easily blown apart by upward movement of air than by downward movement (this helps to keep us from drowning). It takes more force to keep the folds in contact to resist outflow of air than inflow. In addition, the typical acoustic target of an ejective release requires a greater transglottal pressure differential, entailing a tighter constriction of the glottis, compared to that required for implosives. That in turn makes it harder to blow the vocal folds apart with ejectives, compared to implosives.

3
  • 1
    Voicing doesn't require subglottal pressure to be higher than supraglottal pressure; it requires a pressure differential across the glottis, in either direction (if subglottal pressure had to be the higher of the two, then it would also be impossible to voice pulmonic ingressives; instead, voiced pulmonic ingressives are quite easy to create, although they aren't actually used by any natural language).
    – Vikki
    Apr 18 at 19:56
  • "In addition, the typical acoustic target of an ejective release requires a greater transglottal pressure differential, entailing a tighter constriction of the glottis, compared to that required for implosives" - please explain why this would be the case?
    – Vikki
    Apr 18 at 19:57
  • Finally, what helps keep us from drowning isn't any inherent check-valve property of the glottis; it's the fact that it reflexively clamps shut if water starts entering.
    – Vikki
    Apr 18 at 19:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.