Which PIE participle (active/middle/passive voice) corresponds to PGmc past participle?

1 Answer 1


The Proto-Germanic (and Latin, and others) past passive participles correspond with the Proto-Indo-European verbal adjectives:

From Beekes' 2011 p. 280:

18.9.2 The verbal adjective
This is an adjective that is not derived from a tense stem, as is the participle, but from a root. The most frequently found is the adjective in *-to- the root has zero grade.
    Skt. *syūtá-‚ ‘sewn’, OCS šitъ < *sjū-tъ, Lith. siṹ-tas
    Skt. *gatá-, Gr. *batós, Lat. (in)-ventus ‘arrived’ < *gwm-tó-
    Lat. tentus ‘stretched’ < *tn-to-
    Arm. lu ‘known’ < *ḱlu-tó-
    Goth. nasiþs ‘saved’ < *-tó-s

Germanic uses this suffix to form the verbal adjective of weak verbs, as in E. fill-ed. [Emphasis mine.]

    The same function as *-to- was fulfilled by *-no-:
    Skt. bhinná- < *bhid-nó- ‘split’
    Skt. pūrṇá- ‘full, filled’, OCS plъnъ, Lith. pìlnas, OIr. lán, Goth. fulls, all from *plh1-no-, Lat. plēnus (with full grade)

The suffix form *-eno- is found in OCS vlьčenъ ‘pulled’. In Germanic *-ono- is used for the strong verbs: Goth. bit-ans < **-onos, E. bitten (sometimes *-ino-: Runic slaginaz,
OS geslegen ‘beaten’).

In PIE, these weren't participles proper, but verbal adjectives, even if many daughter languages they functioned like participles:

From Luraghi, Inglese, and Kölligan 2021:

Ancient IE languages attest to nominal forms of the verb, participles and verbal adjectives that may have a passive orientation when based on transitive verbs, that is, they may profile the event encoded by the base verb from the perspective of the Patient or P-participant. Notably, though the details of the morphological shape and the semantics of these morphemes differ in the IE languages, most of these forms, e.g. -nt- participles, *-to-, *-no-*, and *-lo- verbal adjectives, can be traced back to PIE (see Adrados et al. 2016: 369–375; Beekes 2011: 279–280; Fortson 2010: 108–109; Meier-Brügger 2010: 317–320, 421). **It must be stressed that in the system of the proto-language these were derivational deverbal morphemes, i.e. they were not obligatory and were not integrated in verbal inflectional paradigms, as is also shown by their partly idiosyncratic semantics. Accordingly, the -nt- and the -to- suffixes were used to derive verbal adjectives from verb bases and were originally indifferent to voice distinctions (Melchert 2017; Szemerényi 1996).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.