-1

here.

my native language (Georgian) is said to have velarized [ɫ] and plain [l] as the allophones of the /l/ phoneme, [ɫ] appears before back vowels /ɑ ɔ u/ and [l] appears before front vowels /i ɛ/.

I'm asking this question because in my speech at least I can't tell difference between an /l/ sound before a front vowel and an /l/ sound before a back vowel.

3
  • It sounds velarised to me, but quite weakly so – more than a ‘pure’ /l/ such as that found in French, Irish (slender) or Danish, but less than the dark l found in English, Irish (broad), Catalan or Russian. Aug 5 at 23:20
  • isn't Russian /ɫ/ actually pharyngealized [lˁ]? Aug 6 at 0:44
  • I’m not an expert on Russian, but Wikipedia says it’s both been described as velarised and pharyngealised. The symbol /ɫ/ covers both the velarised and pharyngealised variants. Aug 6 at 7:33

1 Answer 1

0

Yes, it sounds velarized, but you really need a standard of comparison. Within the language, you should compare /la/ and /le/. Since there is no contrast in Georgian, it's not surprising that you can't hear a difference. Compare plain l and the velarized diacritic on the IPA chart here – your performance in that token is closer to the velarized tokens esp. of House and Wells.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.