1

As far as I understand, saying that two words are polysemes is saying they're synonymous homonyms, but not synonymous enough to be the same word. Senses on the other hand, are synonymous enough to be counted as variations of the same word.

Perhaps it is not the degree of synonymy that is the distinguisher, but rather the nature of the synonymy? Perhaps senses are variations of a word's definition depending on context, whereas polysemes arise from the metaphorical usage of words?

So, murder can mean "partaking in any action leading to the death of an organism" in common parlance (one context), and mean "intentionally make a person die" in legalese (another context). One is in fact a generalization of the other (if that's important).

Whereas pig can mean the animal pig, or it can mean person that acts in a disgusting way; one is in no way the other, but has arisen from analogy and symbolism.

Improve this question
2
  • 3
    As far as I understand, polysemy is not a relation between two words like synonymy, but rather a condition of a single word that has many meanings. So definitions don't start by "saying that two words are polysemes". I've never heard that word before, especially not in the plural.
    – jlawler
    Sep 19, 2022 at 19:08
  • 3
    Indeed. The OED defines polyseme as " A word or lexical unit that has several or multiple meanings". Using this definition, your explication is flawed: Saying two wards are polysemes is incoherent.
    – Colin Fine
    Sep 19, 2022 at 19:22

0

Reset to default

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy