I'm a teenager from Chicago with a pretty standard contemporary Midwestern/General American accent (not distinctly Chicago). I'm interested in the phonetic phenomenon of Canadian Raising, in which diphthong phonemes such as those in the words "price" and "mouth" (the keywords of Wells' PRICE and MOUTH lexical sets) can be shortened and begin at a noticeably higher location in the vowel space in certain environments. In my accent, MOUTH vowel raising is not present, but PRICE raising absolutely is. This is the case for a lot of the United States.

The standard rule states that the raising occurs before voiceless consonant sounds (presumably, all of them) and not before vowels, pauses in speech, and voiced consonants (presumably, none of them). However, I and others have noticed that this rule is a bit inaccurate and, perhaps, overly reductive.

I have a distinction between the vowels in price/prize, flight/flied, and tripe/tribe - just as the rule indicates. But I also have the writer/rider distinction, where the following consonant sound is the same in both. This can be explained if we adapt the rule to cover PRICE vowels preceding fortis non-syllabic (consonantal) phonemes, rather than voiceless consonant phones. However, there is a famous exception to this: "spider," which has a raised vowel before /d/, as if the word were "spiter."

Sometimes a little extra note is added to the rule specifying that the following voiceless consonant must be in the same morpheme as the diphthong (sometimes they say it must be in the same syllable). This works for "high tide" (both very open) but not for "high school" (raised). I don't know if this is due to the ambisyllabicity of the /s/ in "high school" or the commonality of the phrase.

Some people have Canadian raising pre-/r/, and I don't know why. Analyzing my own accent, the distribution seems extremely strange: I have raising in "fire," and yesterday I caught myself using a very mid-central starting point in "tired." I think it works for all /t/PRICE/r/ and /f/PRICE/r/patterns. Going through a quick scan of consonants, the pre-/r/ raising doesn't seem to occur for me in any other situation - "wire" and "dire" begin pretty open, and so do "sire," "pyre," "shire," and "hire." Either there is something special about /f/ and /t/, or this is a weird form of lexical diffusion.

I would like to know whether or not my Canadian Raising distribution is common, where different exceptions are common or not, and what the most common distribution is. What is the best rule for the occurrence of the raised allophone of the PRICE vowel in accents like mine, and the MOUTH vowel for others?

I am aware that phonetics does not always follow "rules," but Canadian Raising seems to be a phenomenon which is almost always explained by a catchy rule. The examples I described above contest that simple rule, and I feel (possibly incorrectly) they are more than just random exceptions. There must be something other feature, something else to add to the rule - there always is.

  • But the following consonants in writer and rider are not the same: it’s /raɪtər/ versus /raɪdər/. They merge phonetically as [ɾ], but they are phonemically distinct, and that’s what matters. The high tide vs high school distinction is probably better described as a difference between compounds and non-compounds, as noted in the Wikipedia article, which also gives the even more minimal pair h[aɪ]gh school (school that is located up high) vs h[ʌɪ]gh school (secondary school for 14–18-year-olds). Mar 1 at 16:53
  • As the Wikipedia article also makes clear, the trouble with ‘Canadian raising’ is that it’s not just one thing – it’s a whole group of related sound shifts that occur to varying degrees, with varying outcomes, in varying conditions over quite a large geographic area. One feature of it (such as pre-/r/) may be common in some of those areas, but completely absent elsewhere. And you can’t formulate simple, universal rules for something that’s really fifteen separate, but related, phenomena. Mar 1 at 16:57

1 Answer 1


The standard explanation for the fact that you mention (writer/rider) have different vowels but the same phonetic consonant is rule ordering. In some dialects, the rule is sensitive to the underlying consonant's voicing, not the rule-derived surface voicing. Shifting terminology from "voicing" to "fortis" doesn't explain anything.

  • Yes, shifting from "voiced/voiceless" to "fortis/lenis" is not really important for this phenomenon or the writer/rider pair. The reason I call the phonemes fortis/lenis rather than voiced/voiceless is because we don't always actually voice /b d g/ at the start of stressed syllables. The more important thing I was saying there is that while raising is a phonetic (not phonemic) phenomenon, but it can be activated by phonemic (not phonetic) following consonants in the case of intervocalic /t/ and /d/. It seems that you agree.
    – Graham H.
    Mar 1 at 18:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.