1

is "together" a monomorphemic word or can it be broken into "to" (derivational prefix) "geth" (bound root) "er" (inflectional suffix). or could it be I a free open-class word either because it can have other forms such as togetherness

Improve this question
1
  • 1
    I am not entirely sure of the nature of "-er" here, but it is certainly not an inflectional suffix (I would be lead to believe it is part of the root). "to-" being a derivational prefix makes more sense, as it is not too difficult to see how the root "gather" would have evolved to become "gether" in this situation.
    – Quintus Caesius - RM
    May 17 at 8:11

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
4

Old English togædere is patently a compound to+gædere, with the last part cognate with New English “gather”. But since “gether” no longer exists in English, I suppose that synchronically “together” is a single morpheme.

Improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.