1

Although the traditional phonemic assignment of English <j> and <ch> are /dʒ/ and /tʃ/, respectively, I believe there's an argument to be made that these are realized in some American dialects as /tʃ/ and /tʃʰ/. These would be analogous to the Mandarin pinyin <zh> and <ch> and so could be a useful pedagogical tool in that regard when considering English minimal pairs (junk /tʃʌŋk/ vs. chunk /tʃʰʌŋk/). Are there dialects where this distinction is more clearly noticed?

7
  • 1
    Sure. That happens. But it's probly not a dialectal form with a local speech group; it's more likely to be an individual variation in somebody's speech. Individual variation is much broader than areal phenomena.
    – jlawler
    Jun 2, 2023 at 2:15
  • 4
    Did you mean "phonemic" in the title?
    – TKR
    Jun 2, 2023 at 2:38
  • 1
    /tʃ/ and /tʃʰ/ are analyses, [tʃ] and [tʃʰ] are realizations.
    – user6726
    Jun 2, 2023 at 16:54
  • 2
    The question is somewhat unclearly asked, since it conflates phonemic and phonetic values, but regardless of the exact interpretation, I think it would be hard to answer anything but yes to the main question: it is very common in all Englishes for ⟨j⟩ to be pronounced [tʃ] and ⟨ch⟩ as [tʃʰ], and it would also be perfectly possible to analyse the data in a way that these sounds correspond to phonemes denoted /tʃ/ and /tʃʰ/. Whether the former is dialect-dependent (the latter definitely is not) is a better question, to which I don’t know the answer. Jun 2, 2023 at 19:57
  • 2
    Also note that the same observation goes for ⟨b/p⟩, ⟨d/t⟩, ⟨g/c~k⟩, etc. All ‘voiced’ stops and affricates in English are frequently realised as unvoiced, as in Mandarin, and you can certainly analyse them as being phonemically /p t k/ vs aspirated /pʰ tʰ kʰ/. The primary reason this is not usually done is that they are normally voiced postvocalically, where they also serve to lengthen the preceding vowel. Initial devoicing is a simpler process than non-initial voicing + subsequent vowel lengthening. Jun 2, 2023 at 20:01

1 Answer 1

1

English /θ/ ‘th’ is typically pronounced with an aspirated consonant in Indian English, [t̪ʰ]. The θ sound is not found in any common language indigenous to India, but aspirated consonants are common.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.