0

I have an article by Hamp from 2011 and one by Blažek from 2014, but need to know if there is anything more recent, so I can cite it in an article that needs to be finished yesterday.

12
  • I PIE: eghom PA: i-ka-u Chukchi: e-ɣә-mi We PA: i-ka-mi Thou Chukchi: e-ɣә-tu PA: i-ka-su
    – Anixx
    Commented Oct 15, 2023 at 9:27
  • Thank you and I can see that some years ago someone named Sir Cornflakes claimed such a relationship and moreover seemed to be saying that the proof of a connection between IE and CK was just these pronouns. But he used passives like "is considered". Would it be too much to ask for specific references to who has claimed this and where? Commented Oct 15, 2023 at 18:25
  • I asked this question in 2015: linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/12402/…
    – Anixx
    Commented Oct 15, 2023 at 18:29
  • This also may be relevant for wider comparison: linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/47389/…
    – Anixx
    Commented Oct 15, 2023 at 18:31
  • I found discussions in russian, with you as a leading participant, and while they are a bit unclear, it appears that Bengtson is the (usual) suspect identified there. In case you care (or anyone else), I am about to publish (and have already been showing to people) an IE-internal etymology of the words, and I wanted just to acknowledge any ideas that there might be out there, good or bad (not for me to judge). Commented Oct 16, 2023 at 5:03

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.