2

Wikipedia claims that Ladefoged & Maddieson (1996) p. 323 states that ʕ̞ is equivalent to the semivowel articulation of ɑ.

Is this true?

If so, why?

If not, what is the false premise behind this claim?

Edit:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semivowel#Classification

1
  • For additional reference, the current claim on Wikipedia is: "The pharyngeal approximant [ʕ̞] is also equivalent to the semivowel articulation of the open back unrounded vowel [ɑ]." and it is indeed attributed to page 323 of Ladefoged & Maddieson, but like @user6726 states, I don't see the claim on that page.
    – LjL
    Nov 30, 2023 at 18:28

1 Answer 1

2

It is not true, Ladefoged & Maddieson do not make that claim there or anywhere else. If you found such a Wiki page you could check the history to see who made up this attribution (it's always best to give a link to a Wiki claim since there are billions of pages and it's impractical to check them all).

It is true that L&M do discuss the idea that there might be "non-syllabic vowel-like sounds that might be considered as semivowels", or "semivowels corresponding to mid-vowels". The examples involve short diphthongs, where the entire syllable nucleus is packed under a single mora. North Saami presents an example, where there is a surface distinction between [ĭe], [ie] and [je], the former being a short diphthong, the second being a long dipthong, and the third being a glide plus vowel sequence. The dialect that I worked on does not have short [ŏa], the mid diphthongs are all long, but some dialects also have [ŏa, ĕa]. These transcriptions mean that you have two vocoids and perceptually the second element, the lower vowel, is more prominent, leading to the impression of a shortened first vowel.

In the table of Nepali examples provided by L&M, they do in fact include underlying forms with both /ai/ and /ia/, /ao/ and /oa/. The transcribed outcomes are [ja, aj, aŏ, ŏa], meaning that supposed desyllabification or at any rate shortening affects the higher vowel, and does not affect /a/.

5
  • Then what is [ŏ] and [ĕ]? Nov 30, 2023 at 22:48
  • The breve mark means "extra-short vowel".
    – user6726
    Dec 1, 2023 at 0:07
  • I meant, what would their semivowels be if any? Dec 1, 2023 at 18:59
  • Non-syllabic [o] would be transcribed as [o̯]. You actually do find [i̯] being used in old works to represent [j].
    – user6726
    Dec 1, 2023 at 19:05
  • So is [o̯] a semivowel as [i̯] is? Dec 1, 2023 at 19:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.