8

The Scandinavian languages have a suffix definite article which is pretty straightforwardly tacked on to to the ends of nouns: -en, -et.

But in languages of the Balkan Sprachbund, Romanian, Bulgarian, Macedonian, and Albanian it is not so simple.

For some genders in some languages, depending on other attributes of the noun form such as number, it may be a simple tacked on suffix like Romanian masculine singular -ul.

But in most cases it's not simply tacked on at all but just one of several factors that contribute to deciding which inflectional ending to take, such as gender, number, and case.

Typically the result might be that the indefinite vs definite form differ by having different final vowels such as Albanian Tiranë -> Tirana, but there can even be internal changes such as Albanian Shkodër -> Shkodra.

Yet in all these languages it's widespread and seemingly standard to still refer to all of these languages as having a definite article suffix rather than talk about "definiteness" as a noun property. Why?

  • 1
    Maybe it's an inflectional suffix? – dainichi May 17 '12 at 1:26
  • 1
    Shkodër -> Shkodëra -> Shkodra (the ë is silent so no need to write it) – Marin May 24 '13 at 17:27
8

I don't see why a definite article suffix and "definiteness" as a noun property contradict each other. The "definiteness" is achieved by attaching a suffix morpheme to the indefinite version.

And just to comment on your comparison between Scandinavian languages and e.g. Albanian, I don't see much difference. I know nothing about Albanian, but from your examples, I would assume that '-a' is the definite article suffix, and 'Tiranë -> Tirana' and 'Shkodër -> Shkodra' are results of vowel elision in the last syllable of the stem.

The exact same phonomenon happens in e.g. Danish.

måne -> månen 'moon -> the moon'
morgen -> morgnen 'morning -> the morning'
  • Yes. Romanian feminine works almost the same: the article is -a (Lat. acc. illam→ Rom. -euă → -eau → -a), and if the word ends with that -ă (which generally corresponds to Albanian -ë) then -ăa → -a. – Adam Bittlingmayer Jun 25 '16 at 6:17
  • That's only one of the eight Romanian endings for definite noun forms and only one of the fifteen Albanian endings for the definite noun forms. The Albanian morphology Wikipedia page currently does talk about noun definiteness rather than definite suffix. – hippietrail Sep 28 at 5:57
7

There's actually been a lot of work on this kind of issue in morphosyntax. I'm not sure exactly what the best starting point is, but you might want to take a look at this Dost/Gribanova WCCFL paper on Bulgarian, since you mention that as one of the languages of interest, and this paper directly addresses the issue of whether definiteness is an "affix". I know there's been some subsequent research on definiteness in several of those languages, but I'm just not as familiar with it, so can't point to it as easily. (But check on google scholar what papers cite this, and cite the Embick & Noyer paper.)

6

The lines are blurry, but there are some good reasons to see these as distinct suffixes and not inflections:

etymology

Some of the suffixes evolved from previously separate words like determiners and pronouns like ille and . In fact, in Romanian the suffix itself is declined and can also occur separately for emphasis.

grammar

In Macedonian, Bulgarian and Balkan Romance, the suffix is or can be appended not to the noun but to the adjective if there is one, again revealing its origin as a separate word.

morphology

These languages have or had case, so there as a separate established notion of what qualifies as noun inflection.

regularity

Unlike with declensions, there really are no internal nor unpredictable changes to the words, occasionally the final portion changes due to elision but that happens in languages where articles precede the noun too.

European tradition

The obvious analogy to the linguists who first worked on this and to the educated speakers of these languages is to definite articles as in Western European and Semitic languages. (The neighbouring Turkic languages and Iranic languages have no definite articles.)

All that said, it is common to simply avoid the question by referring to the definite forms of a noun for these languages. (That's how Wiktonary declension tables refer to them for Albanian, Armenian and Bulgarian. For Romanian they say definite articulation.)

Although no writing system is phonetic, that is often a local ideal, so where -ë + -a or -ă + -a is pronounced as -a would be, the tendency is to write -a.

  • It's perhaps worth pointing out concretely that there is a dialect continuum from Macedonian and Bulgarian to Serbo-Croatian and back to Old Church Slavonic, which like all other Slavic languages have case declensions but no articles. So it is very obvious to us that these are appended suffixes, because very similar languages exist without them. – Adam Bittlingmayer Jun 24 '16 at 21:53
5

As for even more recent work, Harizanov and Gribanova have the following paper: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7473d2rt

It directly addresses those properties of DEF that make it seem both like an "affix" and not like one.

The role of morphological and phonological factors in Bulgarian allomorph selection, with Vera Gribanova. 2011. In Morphology at Santa Cruz: Papers in Honor of Jorge Hankamer, (eds) N. LaCara, A. Thompson, and M. A. Tucker. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center.

4

In Bulgaria, the definite article did start as a separate word, which loosely translates to "this one". or "he", "she" and "it" for the 3 genders, so Bulgarian ended with different suffixes for each gender.

As example:

котка+тя = котката [kotka + tya = kotkata] {cat+she} FEMALE

куче+то = кучето [kuche + to = kucheto] {dog+it} NEUTRAL

елен+той = еленът [elen + toy = elen't] {deer+he} MALE

кон+той = конят [kon + toy = konyat] {horse+he} MALE

(It seems the ending for male words had been abbreviated to simply the letter T with a vowel between it and the last consonant of the word).

The origin of the article as a separate word is also clearly visible, as stated above, in the way the suffix is added to the adjective before the noun while leaving the noun in its indefinite form, but carrying the gender of the noun. In case of multiple adjectives, only the first one gets the suffix:

голяма+тя бяла котка = голямата бяла котка [goljama+tya byala kotka = golyamata byala kotka] {the big white cat}

In that way Bulgarian is similar to English, German, Spanish, and other European languages where only the first of a series of adjectives is "affected" by the definite article.

  • I believe it's the usual way for inflectional endings to develop from separate words. Perhaps most inflections are much older though whereas this was an observed change in the history of the language. – hippietrail Dec 4 '17 at 4:57
-1

I haven't an authoritative answer, but it seems to me that this is mostly because Indo-Europeanists are not used to thinking about "definiteness" as opposed to a "definite article".

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.