5

At first I thought that there was only such a thing as lexical do and periphrastic, but recently I stumbled upon something else (unfortunately I do not recall what it was called). Whatever be the case, it seems that do can be used for quite a lot of grammatical things (do-support being one). Could someone give some of these roles do can play?

  • 1
    Good question. There are indeed several different functions for the English auxiliary verb do, just as there are for all English auxiliary verbs. – jlawler Jan 18 '14 at 22:12
  • 2
    I created some new tags for this question. I feel "do" has enough different meanings, usages, and subtleties to warrant a tag all its own but this site isn't just for English. I also think the "syntax" tag is a better one for this question than the "grammar" tag so I've changed that too. – hippietrail Jan 25 '14 at 19:17
7

In English, certainly the most common use of do is Do-Support.
DS is invoked whenever a construction requiring an auxiliary verb (like Question or Negative):

  • S: Bill is coming today Ques: Is Bill coming today? Neg: Bill isn't coming today.

gets applied to a verb chain without an auxiliary verb in it already; i.e, a bare main verb:

  • S: Bill came today Ques: Did Bill come today? Neg: Bill didn't come today.

As I used to tell my students, if you don't have an auxiliary verb,
you have to go out and get one, and the one that you get is do.

Do-Support applies to any verb that's not an auxiliary, no matter what it means.

This is not true, however, of a different kind of do, called "Action do" or Act for short.
(See John R. Ross, 1972. "Act", in Davidson & Harman, Semantics of Natural Languages )
This is the do that is the pro-verb for any active verb (just like a pronoun is for nouns),
but which doesn't work with stative verbs like own.

This distinguishes Act do from Do-Support do:

  • Bill raked the yard, didn't he? (Do-Support do, active verb)
  • Bill use to own that house, didn't he? (Do-Support do, stative verb)
  • Raking the yard was not pleasant for Bill, but he did it. (Act do, active verb)
  • *Owning the house was not pleasant for Bill, but he did it. (Act do, stative verb - therefore ungrammatical, whence the asterisk)

Plus any number of other uses for do (Why don't we do it in the road? - both do's, no waiting)

| improve this answer | |
  • 4
    Excellent answer. I'd just like to add that do can be inserted to contrastively focus the polarity of an assertion, e.g. A: John didn't go to shops. B: That's wrong. John DID go to the shops". Maybe one could analyse this as another example of do-support - an auxiliary must be present to host the contrastive stress, and so do is inserted. – P Elliott Jan 18 '14 at 23:36
  • Yes, emphatic do is another. I was happy to turn off the tap, though, since it wasn't clear which phenomenon the OQ was referring to. – jlawler Jan 18 '14 at 23:38
  • 1
    A good point, friends. Thank you for the explanation. – Yellow Sky Jan 18 '14 at 23:58
  • 1
    Emphatic do has already been mentioned by P Elliott; and they're all periphrastic since they're all auxiliary verbs. "Periphrastic" is not a name, but a description; it means "paraphrased with auxiliaries", so the entire English verb phrase can be called periphrastic. It's not a useful term here. If you've come across a construction some folks call "periphrastic do", trot out an example and we'll identify it. – jlawler Jan 19 '14 at 16:07
  • 1
    Which is why I prefer to call it "Do-Support do"; I'm a category Splitter by inclination and never trust official category Lumps. – jlawler Jan 19 '14 at 18:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.