Actually, I want to know what are the factors to notice in determining semantic features of different parts of speech.

I recognize some of them like +/- animate, +/- human, +/- male, and +/- young.

But are there any other features? For example, how can I identify different semantic features for words such as book and notebook?

  • Yes, there are lots of them. Most of them aren't +/- binary features, though. A short list of semantic features (for entities -- aka nouny words -- only) can be found here, and a reading guide to the book it came from can be found here. – jlawler Feb 23 '14 at 19:07
  • Thank you jlawler for your reply. I can't access your first link which is about list of semantic features. Could you upload it for me? Thanks a million. – zahra Feb 24 '14 at 19:07
  • Sorry; I mistyped the link. Here it is, corrected: umich.edu/~jlawler/meta4/FrawleyEntities.pdf – jlawler Feb 24 '14 at 19:15

A good start could be to look into how WordNet classifies words. WordNet uses hyponymy and hypernymy to establish semantic relationships between synsets.

For example, if you look for 'book', you get the following derivation:

book < publication < work < product < creation < artifact < unit < object

| improve this answer | |

If you look at Altaic languages (e.g., Korean, Japanese, etc.) you will find that they have highly developed semantic features that may possibly be applied.

In Korean you can find features such as +/- action, +/- abstract, +/- count, etc. The list goes on in Altaic languages, so these may be a good place to look when considering different types of semantic features.

In English, while we do not necessarily have as overt of a semantic feature bundle system, it is not entirely unheard of in the language.

Consider the three transitive verbs 'sit' (e.g., The clock sits on the desk), 'lie' (e.g, The watch lies on the desk), 'stand'(e.g., The vase stands on the desk).

The types of items which can 'sit' might be classified as -animate, +compact (or some designation of the sort). Consider bowls, telephones, etc.

The types of items which can 'lie' might be classified as -animate, + flat. Consider sheets of paper, rulers, shirts, etc..

The types of items which can 'stand' might be classified as -animate, +tall. Consider chairs, tables, lamps, etc.

The idea is that we refer semantically interpret these items in the same manner that we interpret phonological features, which is to say we do it more or less unconsciously.

| improve this answer | |
  • Those verbs identify the orientation of an object, not its type, so they aren't of much use in classifying nouns. Some verbs do identify nouns as abstract/physical or mobile/immobile. – amI Nov 30 '18 at 12:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.