6

In Australia there are two creoles in daily use, Kriol (rop, also known as Roper River Creole etc) in the Northern Territory with about 30,000 speakers and Torres Strait Creole (tcs, also known as Broken etc) in the Torres Strait Islands in far north Queensland with about 25,000 speakers.

Are there any kind of papers or research which investigate or compare the two languages?

Ideal would be something considering various aspects of language one by one (phonology, lexis, pronoun system, etc) and making direct comparisons or the approaches of the two languages such as "While rop does ... , tcs does ...".

4
  • 2
    Wow even this one gets a close vote? But not an attempt to say what's wrong about it? Oct 4 '11 at 19:08
  • I'm guessing that the close vote (not me) came because this doesn't have a well-defined single answer and doesn't contain a question besides the title, but I agree that it is bad form to leave a close vote without saying why. (I also disagree that those are sufficient reasons to close, although we do need clearer guidelines about whether/which questions of the form "Does any X exist" are okay.)
    – Aaron
    Oct 5 '11 at 7:49
  • I think it has a well defined single answer. Either "Yes there are some studies for instance X and Y" or "No for some reason each creole has only been studied in isolation so far". I'll try to reword it a bit though... Oct 5 '11 at 7:58
  • I think the question was clear enough and I agree on the fact that close-voting without explaining is not really helpful; we should encourage the habit that when someone close-votes (the first one) gives a quick explanation of the reason.
    – Alenanno
    Oct 5 '11 at 8:22
4

Yes, there are some sources comparing Kriol to Torres Strait Creole/Broken.

In the 'Handbook of Varieties of English' Vol 1 (Phonology), there is a chapter by Malcolm (2004) 'Australian creoles and Aboriginal English: phonetics and phonology'. You can read some of the chapter here on Google Books, p.656. And in 'Varieties of English' Vol 3 (The Pacific and Australasia), there is another chapter by Malcolm (2008) 'Australian creoles and Aboriginal English: morphology and syntax'. (Sorry, no online content for that one).

These chapters together give a really good overview of the features of both creoles, and frame the discussion by topic rather than by creole, so there is plenty of comparison between them.

Also, here is a link to a (quite dated) paper with some earlier comparisons between the two creoles, by Sandefur (1986). See pages 19-24.

2
  • This is exactly what I was looking for Floating Tone, for years I've only ever found things discussing one or the other. Now I can finally see what some of the similarities and differences are. Fascinating stuff. Oct 5 '11 at 7:56
  • Happy to help. Enjoy! Oct 5 '11 at 9:06
3

Torres Strait Creole has been known as 'Broken' and 'Blaikman', but nowadays is usually called 'Yumplatok' (the indigenous name). The creole in the NT is sometimes known as 'Roper Creole' (it having originated at Roper River Mission) to distinguish it from Kimberley Kriol (spoken in the Kimberley region of WA), but these two may well form a continuum.

The Aboriginal Child Language Acquisition Project (ACLA) has examined child language acquisition in a number of communities in the NT, to the south of the areas where Roper Creole is spoken. There is a discussion of some of the outcomes from the project at this site.

While ACLA has focused on varieties (that might be creoles or mixed languages) from these more southerly areas of the NT, the list of references at the end is very good, athough it seems to exclude Yumplatok. From that list I suggest Mühlhaüsler (2004) may provide you the comparative information you are seeking.

I think the best book about Yumplatok is 'Broken: an introduction to the Creole language of Torres Strait' by Anna Shnukal (1988).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.