4

What is the etymology of the Latin suffix "-ālis" (and related forms like "-āris") as in "nātūrālis"? Do we know any corresponding suffix in other Indo-European languages?

3
  • 1
    Yes: -al and -ar. English has borrowed extensively from Latin, as this dissimilation puzzle shows. – jlawler May 7 '14 at 18:14
  • 1
    I'm sorry it wasn't clear: I'm aware of "-al" and "-ar" in English. I just wanted to follow the etymology further back in time if it's known. – cyco130 May 7 '14 at 20:09
  • It may well be cognate to a Germanic suffix in /l/ or /r/; generally these stay around in IE, but they often dissimilate with each other, as in Latin or Sanskrit. – jlawler May 7 '14 at 20:12
3

(Part of the info in this answer is from Buck's Comparative Greek and Latin Grammar, which, though old and outdated in many respects, is probably still reliable on this point.)

Ultimately, Latin -āli-(s) goes back to a PIE suffix *-lo-, with reflexes in many branches.

Latin -āli- is originally the suffix -li- added to a-stem nouns: e.g. animā- : animālis. It became analyzed as a single, productive suffix, however, and was extended to other types of stems: e.g. mort- : mortālis.

This -li- is the same suffix seen in adjectives like similis, humilis, etc. But it seems to have been originally *-lo-: compare the Greek cognates of these words, ὁμαλός, χθαμαλός. Transfer of adjectives into the i-stem class was pretty widespread in Latin (not just from o-stems but also from other stem types, cf. e.g. suāvis: Gk. ἡδύς).

As for PIE *-lo-, its reflexes form participles in Slavic and Armenian, and are also found less productively but still commonly in Greek (see the examples above and many others, e.g. φῦ-λον, τυφ-λός), Sanskrit (e.g. bahu-lá- 'abundant'), and probably other languages.

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.