My understanding is that, until fairly recently, recitation of the English alphabet was often suffixed by saying "and per se and", roughly translating to "and, by itself, '&'". This suggests that the ampersand was almost sort-of a letter in the English alphabet -- this seems strange to me, because that would make it the only letter which represents an entire word (Latin 'et', meaning 'and') rather than a phonetic sound.

Was the ampersand considered a full citizen of the original Latin alphabet, and, if so, did it evolve into some vestigial afterthought in the modern English language? If so, were there originally other Latin letters that represented full words rather than phonetic sounds?


1 Answer 1


No, the ampersand was not a letter but rather developed from a ligature between e and t in the Latin word et (and - as in etc). It has its origins in 1st century BC and seems to have been in common use since 1st century AD. You can read more about its history on the excellent blog (or book) Shady Characters: http://www.shadycharacters.co.uk/2011/06/the-ampersand-part-1-of-2.

  • 1
    thank you, that was a fascinating read. this leads me to be further curious about how the ampersand came to be recited as part of the english alphabet as if it were a letter. Sep 29, 2014 at 16:34
  • 1
    The Wikipedia article on the ampersand has the answer. Sep 29, 2014 at 19:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.