4

Consider the following data (spoken American English):

  • John said "I'll come."
  • John was like "I'll come."
  • What John said was: "I'll come."
  • ?What John was like was: "I'll come."

Does anyone have an analysis of this?

0
6

BE like is not an integrated collocation meaning SAY. Rather, like is a “discourse marker” which signals that what follows is worthy of particular emphasis or peculiar interpretation.

John was [like [totally excited about it]].
John was [like [jumping up and down]].
John was [like [“I’ll come”]].

In the ‘quotative’ version, like indicates that what follows is an imitation and demonstration of what John ‘was’.

So the Wh-cleft should be:

A: John was like “Oh all right, I’ll come”—
B: No, no, no, what John was was like “I’ll come! I’ll be there!”.

2
  • You might be right, but this is already being reanalyzed by younger speakers, it seems :) agoraphilia.blogspot.jp/2004/04/… – dainichi Oct 24 '14 at 9:23
  • 1
    @dainichi The author reports an innovative use by his five-year-old son; we're gonna hafta wait a generation to see if this takes hold or goes the way of ordinary learning-phase overgeneralizations. – StoneyB on hiatus Oct 24 '14 at 11:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.