3

If you look up a Chinese character and its meaning in classical Chinese, there is a good chance you get a long list with many different semantically unrelated meanings. Take 而 for instance, that bears the meanings: 1. and, 2. but, 3. than and a few further functional meanings.

What is the statistical evaluation of the polysemy of the Chinese words of that time, how did the statistics change over time, did the polysemy increase, decrease, stay more or less the same?

3
  • How do you know the first and second meanings are actually distinct?
    – curiousdannii
    Nov 1 '14 at 2:06
  • 1
    One factor that makes analysis more difficult is that, especially in early writing, a particular graph could be used to write several different words which were not homophones. Nov 2 '14 at 18:41
  • was it frequent back in those time, that a character could refer to many words?
    – meireikei
    Nov 2 '14 at 19:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.