Questions tagged [chomsky]

An American linguist who founded the field of Generative Linguistics.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
4 votes
1 answer
204 views

Chomsky on licensing parasitic gaps in English

Chomsky (1995: 69) says (115) that "(115b) is ruled out for independent reasons of control theory." What reasons? (115) a. the book that you filed [without PRO reading e] b. *the book that ...
Yili Xia's user avatar
  • 653
6 votes
1 answer
750 views

I'm having trouble understanding chomskyan linguistics

ok so I'm trying to understand the argument for an innate language faculty, and specifically Chomsky's opposition to the behaviorist model of language acquisition. Behaviorists thought that language ...
teddygonyea's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
140 views

Why does Chomsky find it surprising that languages are learnable?

From the Minimalist Program, Chapter 1 (20th Anniversary Edition, pg. 16): It has sometimes been argued that linguistic theory must meet the empirical condition that it account for the ease and ...
Julius H.'s user avatar
  • 371
2 votes
1 answer
69 views

A parser for grammars with movement

I'm trying to figure out how the parser algorithm of Harkema 2000 works. It is a bottom-up parser that uses an agenda-driven, chart-based deduction procedure, but what is not clear to me is in what ...
invalid syntax's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
335 views

What does Chomsky mean by "let the rules run freely"?

In this YouTube video: World Science Festival, “Mind Your Language: Thought, Metaphor and Imagination”. (September 30th 2021.) The link is directly to the timestamp of the video where he says the ...
user41964's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
45 views

Abandoning (conventional) lexical class

I am curious to know more about approaches to linguistics that aren’t centrally based on central word classes like nouns, verbs, etc. Instead of taking them as important categories, there could ...
Julius H.'s user avatar
  • 371
1 vote
2 answers
99 views

Wouldn't the premise of Chomsky's universal grammar theory be trivially true?

Quickly put, one could say that Chomsky's Universal grammar theory says that Humans are predisposed to language, and due to this all languages are equivalent. But, aren't all languages equivalent by ...
tryst with freedom's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
387 views

How did Chomsky conceive orthography and spelling?

I am curious to whether Chomsky has ever addressed anything about orthography, spelling or the impact of writing systems. The way I see it, orthography lies outside of Grammar in his theory. I couldn'...
Matt's user avatar
  • 313
2 votes
2 answers
140 views

Saussure and Modern Linguistics

To my knowledge, Chomsky and most other modern linguists rarely ever mention Saussure. Do they still agree that language is an arbitrary and differential system? If not, what happened exactly that ...
John Smith's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
121 views

Is there any connection between formalism and generativism [closed]

Is generativism originated from formalism? How formalism is related to linguistics
Sanika Vinod's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
189 views

To what extent was Chomsky influenced by Tesnière?

Kind of a question about the meta-history of linguistics as a discipline. Chomsky released 'Syntactic Structures' in the US in 1957; Tesnière released Éléments de syntaxe structurale posthumously ...
Khove's user avatar
  • 754
2 votes
0 answers
212 views

What limitations of generative grammar was Lakoff referring to?

In his keynote address in 2015, George Lakoff said the following (at 22:10) The whole idea of generative grammar fell apart. There were things that you could not do with it. Even if it was ...
MWB's user avatar
  • 1,102
2 votes
0 answers
78 views

Kayne on Conjunctions and Chomsky's Labelling Algorithm

I'm reading on coordination structures in relation to Chomsky's proposal of the Labelling Algorithm and stumbled upon Kayne (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax. In it, Kayne takes the view that ...
BritishLinguist's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
206 views

What does this quote by Chomsky mean?

“Language is a process of free creation; its laws and principles are fixed, but the manner in which the principles of generation are used is free and infinitely varied.”
user8104's user avatar
  • 309
3 votes
1 answer
986 views

Critics and arguments against the generative syntax theories?

The Generative approach on syntax is very elegant, useful and very complete as far as I can see. I think that, as all theories have, there must have some critics on it. But I don't know where to find ...
Ergative Man's user avatar
  • 1,426
5 votes
1 answer
359 views

Is Wikipedia's argument for Universal Grammar completely fallacious?

Wikipedia's article about Chomsky makes the following argument for Universal Grammar: For example, although children are exposed to only a very small and finite subset of the allowable syntactic ...
MWB's user avatar
  • 1,102
8 votes
2 answers
469 views

Where to start if you want to do Chomsky style NLP?

I am a computer science grad who has been fascinated by Chomsky's theory of language. I have been following his work and the others in his field. But I also want to try something on my own. The ...
Vicyan's user avatar
  • 321
1 vote
0 answers
141 views

Why would French fit science, and English fit literature?

I happened upon this on r/asklinguistics that, being 9 months old, has time-barred comments. I've a shade rectified some mistakes and rewritten it. Noam Chomsky, in some interview, said that ...
user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
165 views

( New formulation) Are parts of speech syntactic categories? ( A question on generative grammer)

I only have a rudimentary ( or even less than rudimentary) knowledge of generative grammar. But what strikes me is that the sentence formation rules are coinded using parts of speech. For example ( ...
user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
254 views

Question on move operation

I'm learning about minimalism at the moment. I'm not sure if I understand the move operation. I think I understand that in English the move operation takes place when you want to formulate a question....
lmc's user avatar
  • 939
0 votes
2 answers
543 views

Phonology: Exemplars vs. Abstract Phoneme Theory

I have come across an essay title asking us to critique the evidence of language being processed as either “abstract phonemes” or “surface exemplars”. (Specifically in phonology) Is this a rewording ...
tiredstudent's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
117 views

How do generativists account for apparent diachronic processes that cause errors in linguistic performance to become cemented as competence?

Many diachronic processes of language change appear to derive from synchronic errors in linguistic performance. How do generativists account for this if performance and competence are separate? If ...
ubadub's user avatar
  • 627
0 votes
1 answer
253 views

English Stress and Rule Based Accounts SPE Chomsky/Halle

Is the following morpho-syntactic representation of the below phrase using brackets correct? Long Bike Ride And subsequently, would the below cyclically applied rules showing the resulting stress ...
user20061's user avatar
5 votes
3 answers
544 views

Is generative grammar a theory or an approach?

I am trying to understand the first sentence of Wikipedia's page on generative grammar: Generative grammar is a linguistic theory that regards grammar as a system of rules that generates exactly ...
SAH's user avatar
  • 243
0 votes
2 answers
311 views

'there' vs 'it' expletive insertion

These are my conditions for detecting an expletive position: if spec IP has been assigned non 'null' Case and is not theta marked. However, after this I struggle to choose between 'it' and 'there'. ...
PolkaDot's user avatar
  • 279
2 votes
2 answers
2k views

Why does 'seem' behave differently?

Mary seems[ t to be here] Mary tried [PRO to be here] Why can't Mary be generated in spec VP of 'seems' but can in 'tried'? Instead it looks like it works more like a passive verb: Mary is believed ...
PolkaDot's user avatar
  • 279
2 votes
3 answers
175 views

How do we explain the fact that agreement comes from the object with 'there'?

For example: There is a man. There are men. How do we explain that agreement of the verb comes from the object in this case alone? What movement happens in the verb complex of the xbar tree of the ...
PolkaDot's user avatar
  • 279
3 votes
1 answer
441 views

Case assignment with prepositions

Consider these examples: 'I am happy with my parents' my parents gets assigned Case by 'with'. *'I am proud with my parents' My question is as follows: What is the reasoning for 2 being ...
PolkaDot's user avatar
  • 279
1 vote
1 answer
249 views

Why do 'wonder' and 'think' act differently in wh-movement?

For instance: Object moving: Who do you think that John saw t? (correct) *Who do you wonder that John saw t? (incorrect) Subject moving: Who do you think t saw John? (correct) *Who do you wonder t ...
PolkaDot's user avatar
  • 279
2 votes
1 answer
988 views

How do you coreference a possesive pronouns with an x-bar tree?

Following Chomsky's linguistic theory (The Minimalist Program), r-expressions must be free, where free means that nothing should c-command it such that the indices have a non null intersection (if I ...
PolkaDot's user avatar
  • 279
4 votes
1 answer
123 views

How do you assign Case to sentences with an infinitval clause?

Look at this example: For the butler to attack the robber would be surprising. Here, the butler and the robber are assigned accusative Case. Is 'For' assigning case to the butler and 'to attack' ...
PolkaDot's user avatar
  • 279
1 vote
1 answer
1k views

What is the x-bar tree of 'I am proud of my students'? (having trouble with proud)

I am having trouble attaching the 'proud' to the 'am'. 'Am' is a verb and 'proud' is an adjective for the noun 'I', so should come as an adjunct for 'I', but here it would have to somehow come from ...
PolkaDot's user avatar
  • 279
1 vote
1 answer
372 views

Why is it that the wh-word as a subject in the spec position cannot raise over an auxiliary verb like 'did'?

When the question word is the subject of the clause, there is no aux verb, eg 'Who saw you?'. I understand this, but why is 'who did see you?' also correct, with respect to Chomsky's linguistic theory ...
PolkaDot's user avatar
  • 279
3 votes
1 answer
209 views

Transitive nouns (and adjectives) evidences from early Indo-Aryan languages

I search info and explanations about "transitive nouns", I didn't read Chomsky yet. I know he talks about "transitive nouns". Transitivity is typically thought of as a property of verbs, and ...
Quidam's user avatar
  • 622
0 votes
2 answers
105 views

semantics of bizarre usages in view of a second-language-speaker

Generative tradition, as far as I (an amateur) understand, revolves around the 'poverty of the stimulus' argument. So I can understand why I clearly get the meaning 'she shelved her books' or at ...
aksci's user avatar
  • 3
1 vote
0 answers
86 views

Did Chomsky made the first generalization of coordination?

If not then who? And maybe someone can suggest a good book of history of English linguistics? Can't find myself. Thanks!
Sara's user avatar
  • 31
3 votes
2 answers
151 views

Basic background reading request [closed]

I've stumbled onto "The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray" and it's great but I'm almost entirely ignorant about the field of linguistics. I've never come across any of the jargon ...
user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
543 views

Intuitive English example of why linguists think natural language grammar is stronger than CFL?

I have a decent understanding of regular languages, CFLs and r.e. sets from a course in computer science theory. I'm just learning about the Chomsky hierarchy. As an English speaker, I have a ...
bernie2436's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
54 views

Where can I find the mentioned More than one Method article?

Chomsky mentions an article that I have never taken a look at in his talk at the University of Arizona "What is Special About Language?". I've seen "Without Social Context?" but I've never seen the ...
Nick Reardon's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
491 views

Chomsky's Syntactic Structures: Why is {a^n b^n : n ∈ ℕ} not a finite state language?

In (10) (i) of Chomsky's Syntactic Strucures (1957), the set of sentences of a specific language is defined as ab, aabb, aaabbb, ..., and in general, all sentences consisting of n occurrences of ...
erdapfel's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
893 views

Introduction in generative grammar

My name is Antonio, and I'm an undergraduate student at one of the many colleges that are focusing on language. I'm mainly studying the English language, and this is my first year of studying concepts ...
Antonio Nanu's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
221 views

Principles and Parameters: projectionist?

The question/problem I have is related to the way recent generative approaches focus on the Lexicon and Syntax. I would like to know if Principles and Parameters can be considered a projectionist ...
Jago's user avatar
  • 49
2 votes
1 answer
4k views

Difference between Type 0 and Type 1 in the Chomsky hierarchy

i am the beginner in linguistics and i have little problem with understanding Chomsky hierarchy. So i have grammar like this: P = {K -> KL,aK->abK,...} In my opinion, it is not third or second ...
Hadson's user avatar
  • 89
11 votes
3 answers
546 views

What is the essence of the dispute between Wolfe and Chomsky?

I read the report in Sunday's Observer concerning the dispute between Tom Wolfe (author Kingdom of Speech) and Noam Chomsky (professor emeritus Massachusetts Institute of Technology) over their ...
user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
4k views

How was De Saussure's Langue and Parole different from Chomsky's Competence and Performance?

Ferdinan De Sassure has proposed Langue and Parole long before Chomsky proposed his Competence and Performance system of linguistic knowledge? I know that they are different but how?
Hidden Markov Model's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
58 views

Did Chomsky adress Multiword Expressions?

I am not aware of a discussion/definition of multi word expressions by Chomsky? As there exist plethora of "synonyms" (to keep it easy lets state they are synonyms) including compounds, frozen ...
Largo's user avatar
  • 229
-4 votes
2 answers
103 views

Can 'a system of rules that assigns [...] meaning in a definite way' be replaced with 'semantics'?

Source: An Introduction to Language (10 ed, 2014) by V Fromkin, R Rodman, N Hyams. I, and not the book, bolded. [p 7:] A person who knows a language has mastered [1.] a system of rules ...
user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
148 views

Does lack of a common (morpho-)phonological alternation make a word a lexical exception?

I am trying to understand the following passages from The Sound Pattern of English, by Noam Chomsky and Morris Halle. Convention 1: : Every segment of a lexical matrix is automatically marked [+n] ...
brass tacks's user avatar
  • 17.8k
4 votes
0 answers
442 views

Understanding Symbols in Chomsky's *Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory*

I've been reading Chomsky's The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, and have come up rather suddenly against a stumbling block. On page 133, he uses without explanation some notation that's ...
Bob Offer-Westort's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
345 views

Did Chomsky originate the term "rewrite rule"?

The earliest mention of the term "rewrite rule" that I am able to find - in the context of phrase structure grammars - is in Chomsky's "Syntactic Structures" (1957). Did he originate the term?
player.mdl's user avatar