Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with infinitive
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 363
A special verb form not inflected for person and number.
5
votes
Why the infinitive in Portuguese "Cartago tem que ser destruída"?
Spanish: haber/tener de/que 'have to'+ infinitive;
Portuguese: haver/ter de/que 'have to' + infinitive;
Several Southern Italian varieties also have this construction but it is mostly found in Ibero-Romance … This construction is rarer in the other Romance languages: French has avoir á/être á + infinitive while Italian has avere/essere da + infinitive, but the role of the construction is much more limited than …
- 6,718