8
votes
Accepted
To what extent was Chomsky influenced by Tesnière?
I do not think that Chomsky ever cited Tesnière in a meaningful way, because if he had, we would know about it. I state this as the main translator of Tesnière's work Elements of structural syntax ...
- 5,495
7
votes
What does "generative" mean? Can a linguistic theory be non-generative?
For a short version, I'll cite my proposed tag wiki for generative-grammar:
A theory usually associated with Noam Chomsky that accounts for a
language's grammar by a system of rules that are able ...
- 6,333
6
votes
What is the best introduction to Chomskyan linguistics?
The current generative (Chomskyan) approach to syntax is known as the minimalist program. If you want a rigorous introduction to this formalism, you should check Understanding Minimalism (2005) by ...
- 336
6
votes
Human natural language metalanguage
In 1984, I created an Expert System, named XTRAN (TM), whose domain of expertise is computer languages, data, and text. XTRAN parses language content to XTRAN Internal Representation, known as XIR (...
5
votes
Why didn’t generative grammarians value linguistic data from native languages?
The real question that should be asked is, why would anyone write a textbook in the first place? I will only address the question as it applies to phonology, but similar answers can be given for all ...
- 76.9k
5
votes
Accepted
Question on move operation
First, let me get the usual caveats out of the way: MP is a program, not a theory. It tells you what kinds of questions to ask about syntax, and guides you in comparing the answers from competing ...
- 2,605
5
votes
Accepted
What is the difference between generative grammar and transformation grammar?
The "generative" in "generative grammar" is defined by Chomsky in Aspects of the Theory of Syntax as meaning "explicit". Chomsky compares this sense of "generate" to its use in analytic geometry, ...
- 12.3k
5
votes
Critics and arguments against the generative syntax theories?
The best argument I've encountered against generative syntax is that made in C.F. Hockett's State of the Art. Personally, I don't subscribe to it, but you may find it persuasive. Hockett compares ...
- 12.3k
5
votes
Accepted
Is Generative / X-bar Theory prescriptivist? (can the descriptivist linguist create X-bar syntax trees?)
X-bar theory is prescriptivist in a certain sense. It prescribes certain things about the structure of syntax trees: that all branching is binary, for example, and that every XP level dominates an X' ...
- 60.2k
4
votes
Accepted
Is generative grammar a theory or an approach?
My impression is that generative grammar is viewed by some grammarians as a Lakotosian 'research program(me)', not as a 'refutable "theory"'. I am not a generative grammarian (or any kind of ...
- 17.3k
4
votes
Is generative grammar a theory or an approach?
'Generative Grammar' is an ill defined term. You will find linguists using it to mean 'Chomskian Grammar', and linguist who think it can also refer to certain construction grammars. You mention that
...
- 1,033
4
votes
Accepted
What would be the obstacles to creating a language composed of all the words of all the human languages existing today?
Languages are more than just collections of words, and you're going to run into many problems at many levels.
Let's pick one really obvious problem: What counts as a word? The single Yupik word "...
- 2,605
4
votes
Can a TG generate sentences which a CFG cannot generate?
A transformational grammar G is a tuple (P,T) where P is some context-sensitive (e.g. context free) grammar (the 'base component' of G) and T is a finite sequence of transformations over the alphabet ...
- 3,526
4
votes
Accepted
( New formulation) Are parts of speech syntactic categories? ( A question on generative grammer)
To my understanding, it's the other way around.
According to generativists, syntactic categories are a fundamental part of the mental grammar of a language. When you learn a new lemma, like "purple", ...
- 60.2k
4
votes
Do Modern Grammar Theories fall short in explaining Free Word Order?
You say you assume that TGG assumes underlying SVO order for all languages. Why do you assume this? I don't recall any TGG linguist ever proposing such a thing (and I've been around awhile). I just ...
- 12.3k
4
votes
Do Modern Grammar Theories fall short in explaining Free Word Order?
Good points. Exactly this criticism led to the creation of other frameworks in the 1970s and 1980s. In LFG, say, your example sentence would be analysed by the (exocetric) rule S -> X, where X is a ...
- 2,518
4
votes
Is there a linguistic term for “grammatically well-formed word salad”?
Semantic anomaly is the word you're looking for:
Incoherent sentences that are not surface conjunctions of contradictory
sentences do not so blatantly generate contradictory entailments. Indeed,
...
- 6,333
4
votes
Is Panini's grammar regular in the same sense as that present in the Chomsky hierarchy?
This page explains the concept of "regular expression". Also note this discussion of "regex" features available in e.g. Word's regex search and replace function, which are beyond ...
- 76.9k
4
votes
Why does Chomsky consider recursion in language to be a "narrow" ability unique to humans?
First you need to understand what recursion is, especially as applicable to linguistic structure. It is typically understood (defined) as the situation where a type α is defined in terms of type α. ...
- 76.9k
3
votes
Accepted
The Inflectional Phrase and Welsh
I googled for Joan Bresnan which @Atamiri mentioned in the comment and think I've found the analysis that he/she was mentioning and should be what you are looking for.
According to Bresnan (1997), ...
- 6,333
3
votes
What does "generative" mean? Can a linguistic theory be non-generative?
There are many definitions of "generative (grammar)", so there can be no single answer. A separate and interesting question would be to document usage of the term "generative" in publications of ...
- 76.9k
3
votes
Accepted
Why is merge useful?
Merge is more useful as a structure building operation than traditional phrase structure rules or X-bar theory, because unlike the latter, it can freely intersperse with movement. If you require ...
- 336
3
votes
What is the current status of (systemic) functional grammar/linguistics
This is a very broad question, particularly since you put systemic in Systemic Functional Linguistics/Grammar in parentheses.
If you think about the broader functionalist program, you can hardly ...
- 10.6k
3
votes
How do formal theories analyse the syntax of polysynthetic languages?
The question is too broad to answer completely (to start with, it presupposes a shibboleth to distinguish formal theories of syntax), but the answer is easy for minimalism.
The comment in the ...
- 1,886
3
votes
What's the difference between structural and generative linguistics?
1- particular grammar of a particular language which, in a purely mechanical way is capable of enumerating all and anly the grammatical sentences of that language. Generative grammar in this sense was ...
3
votes
Is generative grammar a theory or an approach?
It's an approach, not a theory (IMO, naturally). In Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (where "generative grammar" was first given currency, Chomsky likens the relationship of a grammar to the sentences ...
- 12.3k
3
votes
How do generativists account for apparent diachronic processes that cause errors in linguistic performance to become cemented as competence?
Linguistic performance is part of "language", in the E-language sense. Generative theory is a theory of the computational mechanism, which underlies human speech output. So the grammar say "Do X", but ...
- 76.9k
3
votes
Accepted
Minimalism - a question about a property of merge operation
Not precisely (for the order implications see Kayne 1994 - The antisymmetry of syntax - but note that the work is not uniformly accepted within Minimalism).
Merge is asymmetrical because one of the ...
- 201
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible