MWB
  • Member for 7 years, 8 months
  • Last seen more than a month ago
  • California, USA
accepted
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment

@user6726 I wouldn't say that. I just think that if an SE anon (no offense) is going to contradict a highly respected authority on the topic, he should at least know (or want to know) what that authority was referring to.

comment

@user6726 If you know that some limitations of GG were discovered in '74, I'd say you can ignore his speech. If you don't, you should probably be asking the same Q I just did.

comment

@user6726 He seems to be talking about facts ("discovered", "cannot do"), not just opinions ("like" / "dislike")

asked
Loading…
revised

added 7 characters in body

Loading…
asked
Loading…
comment

+1 but you don't seem to address the first part of the Q (or the title)

accepted
awarded
awarded
revised

apparent missing word

Loading…
suggested
Approve
answered
Loading…
revised

added 362 characters in body; edited title

Loading…
comment

@bytebuster a conspiracy theory who conspired with whom?

1
2 3 4 5