Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 17, 2020 at 10:30 vote accept JRC
Dec 16, 2020 at 21:24 comment added Natalie Clarius @user6726 Not intuitionistic type theory though; that only dates back to 1972 when computers had already been around for a while.
Dec 16, 2020 at 19:55 comment added Natalie Clarius @jk - Reinstate Monica No, he was not. The mentioned book is about natural language, not computer languages.
Dec 16, 2020 at 19:46 comment added user6726 Type theory predates computers by a couple of generations.
Dec 16, 2020 at 19:12 answer added Fred timeline score: 6
Dec 16, 2020 at 18:09 comment added Natalie Clarius @JRC I think you need to specify more precisely what you're after. Are you looking for an assessment of how fruitful type theory is for linguistic applications? A list of recent papers discussing linguistic phenomena with methods of type theory? A modern textbook that covers the basics of type-logical grammar/semantics, or advanced topics?
Dec 16, 2020 at 18:04 comment added Natalie Clarius Not everything that has the word "formal" in it is automatically off-topic for this site; neither is it just because it originates from/also has applications in other fields. The question explicitly asks about the use of this theory in linguistics; I see no problem having it here. Type-theoretic natural language semantics is a thing.
Dec 16, 2020 at 17:08 review Close votes
Dec 24, 2020 at 1:24
Dec 16, 2020 at 16:49 comment added Sir Cornflakes I’m voting to close this question because this is a question on a concept from computer languages.
Dec 16, 2020 at 16:49 comment added Sir Cornflakes Well, Ranta was writing about computer languages (where typing is obviously an important concept) but computer languages aren't studied by linguists.
Dec 16, 2020 at 16:29 history asked JRC CC BY-SA 4.0