Timeline for Differences of 'Meta-linguistic' & 'reflexive' statements
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2014 at 19:09 | history | edited | hippietrail |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 22, 2014 at 12:53 | comment | added | babou | Would it be legally OK to include the text discussed within the question on this site? We do not know how long the outside reference will survive. Besides you can already find it on the web by searching Google with: "identify metalinguistic statements" lyons. It is on page 12 of the book, and Google even gives several other pages. | |
| Mar 22, 2014 at 12:22 | vote | accept | Ak9 | ||
| Mar 21, 2014 at 22:59 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackLinguist/status/447145412739489792 | ||
| Mar 21, 2014 at 15:22 | history | edited | Alenanno | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 116 characters in body
|
| Mar 21, 2014 at 14:34 | comment | added | babou | I wonder why John Lyons is opposing philosophers specifically to formal semanticists. As a formal syntactician I feel neglected and offended :-). I would think actually that syntacticians are more advanced on the metalanguage route than are semanticists, because it seems more easily done for syntax (whatever the limit between syntax and semantics). | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 14:32 | answer | added | babou | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 10:59 | history | asked | Ak9 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |