Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 10, 2020 at 6:47 comment added Tim Osborne The traditional exocentric division S --> NP VP is long outdated. Modern approaches to syntax view either the finite verb as the head, in which case the head is νομίζεις, or an empty C (complementizer) as the head, the interrogative phrase Σε ποιόν φίλο then being in the specifier position of CP.
Jun 10, 2020 at 6:05 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
May 11, 2020 at 5:05 answer added Tim Osborne timeline score: -2
S May 10, 2020 at 19:46 history suggested Tsutsu CC BY-SA 4.0
I corrected a typoo. She wrote "In the Greek sentence above, the subject is positioned to the left of the subject", she meant the "verb" is positioned not the "subject".
May 10, 2020 at 11:46 review Suggested edits
S May 10, 2020 at 19:46
May 10, 2020 at 11:32 answer added Tsutsu timeline score: 1
May 10, 2020 at 10:35 comment added Atamiri The construction is exocentric so there should be no primed category. In the case of a phrase that includes a finite verb and (some of) its arguments S is commonly used, so here you’d have [S V NP] (though the verb is finite so in Greek it’s actually an I but this doesn’t affect the structure).
May 10, 2020 at 9:57 comment added V.Lydia @Atamiri So, there is a V' that consists of the V(speaks) and the NP(the man) ?
May 10, 2020 at 8:25 comment added Atamiri This is a non-configurational context so yes, the subject NP is a sister to the verb which are both (categorially) headed exocentrically. Note that in some languages there may be endocentric VSO structures but Greek doesn’t seem to be the case.
May 10, 2020 at 8:00 history asked V.Lydia CC BY-SA 4.0