Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
hippietrail
  • 14.8k
  • 7
  • 63
  • 149
edited tags
Link
Louis Rhys
  • 8.6k
  • 6
  • 47
  • 72
genetic info for washo language, word order and washo tags
Source Link
hippietrail
  • 14.8k
  • 7
  • 63
  • 149

I've been reading about the Native American language isolate Washo, and looking at the Universals Archive. If an ergative language is SOV, the object and subject affixes will be prefixes and the main or only alternative order will be OSV. But why is the prefix order osV rather than soV? If the subject and object prefixes are reductions of independent pronouns (and in Washo, they seem to be), one would anticipate soV from SOV.

I've been reading about Washo and looking at the Universals Archive. If an ergative language is SOV, the object and subject affixes will be prefixes and the main or only alternative order will be OSV. But why is the prefix order osV rather than soV? If the subject and object prefixes are reductions of independent pronouns (and in Washo, they seem to be), one would anticipate soV from SOV.

I've been reading about the Native American language isolate Washo, and looking at the Universals Archive. If an ergative language is SOV, the object and subject affixes will be prefixes and the main or only alternative order will be OSV. But why is the prefix order osV rather than soV? If the subject and object prefixes are reductions of independent pronouns (and in Washo, they seem to be), one would anticipate soV from SOV.

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackLinguist/status/116611761897095168
Source Link
Loading