Timeline for How do Agglutinative Features/Languages develop out of Fusional Features/Languages?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2020 at 22:45 | comment | added | Sir Cornflakes | @curiousdannii: The typological cycle theories are just now being deconstructed. There are transition probabilities between any possible typological status, and the transitions aren't really circular. | |
| Sep 18, 2020 at 17:40 | answer | added | Paul | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 5, 2020 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackLinguist/status/1302305517507932166 | ||
| Sep 5, 2020 at 1:38 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Sep 4, 2020 at 23:54 | comment | added | Paul | Hmmm. I'm no expert myself, but in the case of Nepali (and Hindi), there is no doubt that they are more agglutinative than their parent Middle Indic languages, which are more fusional. | |
| Sep 4, 2020 at 22:55 | comment | added | curiousdannii♦ | I thought in the cycle hypothesis fusional languages developed from agglutinating languages, not the other way round. | |
| Sep 4, 2020 at 21:22 | vote | accept | Paul | ||
| Sep 4, 2020 at 18:45 | answer | added | user6726 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 4, 2020 at 17:36 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 5, 2020 at 10:09 | |||||
| Sep 4, 2020 at 17:32 | history | asked | Paul | CC BY-SA 4.0 |