Timeline for Does the term "(highly) agglutinating language" refer to inflectional endings, word-formation processes, or both?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2014 at 17:22 | history | edited | jlawler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| May 6, 2014 at 14:18 | history | edited | hippietrail | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
| Mar 7, 2014 at 12:45 | answer | added | Joop Eggen | timeline score: -1 | |
| Dec 26, 2013 at 19:34 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackLinguist/status/416290978606383104 | ||
| Nov 7, 2013 at 4:24 | comment | added | hippietrail | @cyco130: Only that Turkish seems to always be called agglutinative while Esperanto is called agglutinative only sometimes or by some people, in my experience. | |
| Nov 6, 2013 at 10:46 | answer | added | Atamiri | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 6, 2013 at 10:42 | comment | added | Colin Fine | I've always thought that agglutinating was a bogus claim applied to Esperanto by proponents to make it seem less thoroughly European. | |
| Nov 6, 2013 at 9:14 | comment | added | cyco130 | Why do you think Turkish is more agglutinative than Esperanto? As a native Turkish speaker, to me they seem equally agglutinative, both derivationally and inflectionally. | |
| Nov 6, 2013 at 7:01 | history | asked | hippietrail | CC BY-SA 3.0 |