Source: An Introduction to Language (10 ed, 2014) by V Fromkin, R Rodman, N Hyams
[p 86:] For example, determiners
specify
whether a noun is indefi- nite or definite (a boy versus the boy), or the proximity of the person or object to the context (this boy versus that boy). Tense provides the verb with a time[p 563:] determiner (Det) The syntactic category, also functional category, of words and expres- sions, which when combined with a noun form a noun phrase. Includes the articles the and a , demonstratives such as this and that , quantifiers such as each and every , etc.
determine (v.) "to come to an end," also "to settle, decide" (late 14c.)
I already read this and understand the definitions above. Hereafter, I am using the definition of 'determine' as quoted above, but please tell me if the Root 'determine' in 'determiner' (hereafter DET) means something else or has changed semantically.
I do not comprehend how DET can be interpreted to 'determine'.
p 86 above states that DET specify
(ie: determine) something about the noun, but this appears false because context determines the DET used.
Are you asking whether "determiner" is a term of art in linguistics, whose meaning cannot be inferred from the meaning of the verb "determine"?
Yes, I think. I am asking whether Linguistics's definition of 'determiner' is connected (in any meaning) to the ordinary English verb 'determine'. Even if 'determiner' cannot be decomposed morphologically, surely Linguistics chose 'determiner' for some reason?