4

English has a strong preference for parallelism (Wikipedia link), even though sentences lacking parallelism are still considered grammatically correct:


Good:

She likes cooking, jogging, and reading.

Not as good:

She likes cooking, jogging, and to read.


I wonder if there are languages without such a preference?

1
  • 1
    I don’t think this is primarily a linguistic thing. The human brain likes recognisable patterns (they play a big role in how we interpret and experience the world, going all the way back to our proto-brains efficiently registering dangers in our environ), and parallelism is a neat way to generate recognisable and predictable patterns in language. I’d say it’s likely to be fairly universal. Nov 18 at 2:16

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.