1

I am currently reading Fairclough's (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as a supplement to my research, that is, corpus-based CDA on nominal collocations in Russian news corpus.

I am trying to disambiguate several conceptual ideas Fairclough mentioned in his book, one being "taking turn" in CDA. He argues that this "taking turn" can influence the "natural ideology" of discourse, i.e., what interlocutors came to think as what is the common sense in the discourse.

Thanks

3
  • Can you please clarify what your actual question is? Commented Jan 23 at 10:08
  • Please provide a definition of taking turns (with an s), an obvious necessity here. Turn taking refers to dialogue. Taking one's turn to speak. It's a higher level organizational property of speech. According to him: newlearningonline.com/literacies/chapter-8/…
    – Lambie
    Commented Jan 24 at 17:48
  • Norman Fairclough suggests that dominant ideologies become "naturalized" in society; that is, a system of values and subject positions comes to be accepted as natural, obvious, or correct, or as Fairclough puts it, as "common sense". [and] Such assumptions and expectations are implicit, backgrounded, taken for granted, not things that people are consciously aware of, rarely explicitly formulated or examined or questioned. (77) muse.jhu.edu/article/31709 Obviously, this concerns spoken language rather than written text.
    – Lambie
    Commented Jan 24 at 17:59

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.